Elastic bicomponent and biconstituent fibers, and methods of making cellulosic structures from the same

ABSTRACT

The elasticity of elastic, absorbent structures, e.g., diapers, is improved without a significant compromise of the absorbency of the structure by the use of bicomponent and/or biconstituent elastic fibers. The absorbent structures typically comprise a staple fiber, e.g., cellulose fibers, and a bicomponent and/or a biconstituent elastic. The bicomponent fiber typically has a core/sheath construction. The core comprises an elastic thermoplastic elastomer, preferably a TPU, and the sheath comprises a homogeneously branched polyolefin, preferably a homogeneously branched substantially linear ethylene polymer. In various embodiments of the invention, the elasticity is improved by preparation techniques that enhance the ratio of elastic fiber: cellulose fiber bonding versus cellulose fiber:cellulose fiber bonding. These techniques include wet and dry high intensity agitation of the elastic fibers prior to mixing with the cellulose fibers, deactivation of the hydrogen bonding between cellulose fibers, and grafting the elastic fiber with a polar group containing compound, e.g. maleic anhydride.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a division of U.S. Ser. No. 10/799,168, filed Mar.12, 2004, which is a division of U.S. Ser. No. 10/195,279, filed Jul.15, 2002, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No.60/306,003, filed Jul. 17, 2001.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to elastic fibers. In one aspect, the inventionrelates to bicomponent elastic fibers while in another aspect, theinvention relates to biconstituent elastic fibers. In another aspect,the invention relates to bicomponent and biconstituent elastic fibershaving a core/sheath construction. In yet another aspect, the inventionrelates to such fibers in which the polymer that forms the sheath has alower melting point than the polymer that forms the core. In stillanother embodiment, the invention relates to methods of forming elasticcellulosic structures from a combination of cellulosic fibers andelastic bicomponent and/or biconstituent fibers having a core/sheathconstruction.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Cellulosic structures are known for their absorbency, and this propertymakes these structures useful in a wide variety of applications. Typicalexamples of such applications are diapers, wound dressings, femininehygiene products, bed pads, bibs, wipes, and the like. The purpose ofthese products, of course, is to absorb and retain liquids, and theefficiency of these products in performing these tasks is determined, inlarge part, by their structure. U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,816,094, 4,880,682,5,429,856 and 5,797,895 describe various such products, theirconstruction and the materials from which they are made, and each isincorporated herein by reference.

Typically, absorbent cellulosic structures are made of materials that donot easily stretch. For example, cellulose fibers are, for all intentand purpose, inelastic and in many cellulosic structures, e.g. a diaper,they are bonded to one another in a relatively inelastic manner, e.g.,through the use of a latex. Unfortunately, many of these structuresrequire some degree of elasticity for reasons of comfort and use, e.g.,a diaper conforming to the contours of the human body or a wipe havingthe touch and drape of cloth, and if the structure is not sufficientlyelastic, gaps will form within it. Gaps reduce the absorbency of thestructure by preventing the migration of the liquid to all parts of thestructure.

Demand exists for better form-fitting absorbent products. This usuallymeans that not only must the products have improved elasticity, but theymust also be thin and light. Elasticity has been chased to date byadding to or replacing some of the cellulose fibers with an elasticfiber. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,645,542 to Anjur et al., thedisclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference, describesabsorbent products made from a wettable staple fiber (e.g., cellulosefiber) and a thermoplastic elastic fiber, e.g., a polyolefin rubber.However, the mere blending of staple fibers with elastic fibers often isnot enough to obtain the full benefit of the elastic fiber withoutcompromising the absorbency of the staple fiber. Cellulose fibers (thecommonest of the staple fibers) tend to adhere to one another as opposedto adhering with an elastic fiber. As a result, unless a highly uniformmixture of the two fibers is formed during the construction of theabsorbent structure, the two types of fibers tend to segregate and thebenefit of the elastomeric fibers is reduced or lost.

Accordingly, the absorbent product industry has a continuing interest inthe design and construction of absorbent products with improvedelasticity without a compromise in absorbency. This interest extends toboth the nature of the fibers from which the absorbent products aremade, and the methods by which these absorbent products are constructed.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In one embodiment, the invention is a bicomponent fiber of a core/sheathconstruction in which the core comprises the thermoplastic elastomer,preferably a thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU), and the sheath comprisesthe homogeneously branched polyolefin. Preferably, the polymer of thesheath has a lower melting point than the polymer of the core, and morepreferably the polymer of the sheath has a gel content of less than 30percent.

In another embodiment, the invention is a biconstituent fiber in whichone constituent comprises the thermoplastic elastomer, preferably a TPU,and the other constituent comprises the homogeneously branchedpolyolefin. Preferably, the constituent that forms the majority of theexternal surface of the fiber has a lower melting point than the otherconstituent, and preferably has a gel content of less than 30 percent.

In another embodiment, the invention is a blend of fibers (or simply a“fiber blend”) comprising (i) an elastic fiber comprising an elasticcore and an elastic sheath, and (ii) at least one fiber other than theelastic fiber of (i). The core of the elastic fiber preferably comprisesa thermoplastic elastomer, preferably a TPU, and the sheath of theelastic fiber preferably comprises a homogeneously branched polyolefin,more preferably a homogenously branched, substantially linear ethylenepolymer. The polymer of the sheath has a melting point below the meltingpoint of the polymer of the core, and preferably the polymer of thesheath has a gel content of less than 30 weight percent. The fiber of(ii) is essentially any fiber other than the fiber of (i), preferably afiber of cellulose, wool, silk, a thermoplastic polymer, silica or acombination of two or more of these. In another embodiment of theinvention, the fibers of (i) are melt bonded to the fibers of (ii),preferably by exposure to a temperature that is at or slightly below themelt temperature of both the fiber of (ii) and the polymer of the coreof fiber (i) but above the melt temperature of the polymer of the sheathof fiber (i). In yet another embodiment of this invention, the meltbonded fiber blend is substantially free of any added adhesives, e.g.,glue.

In another embodiment of this invention, the blends described in thepreceding paragraph are used to build elastic, absorbent structures.Such structures include paper with elasticity, e.g., form-fittinglabels, and the absorbent padding of a disposable diaper.

In another embodiment, the invention is a fabricated article comprisingelastic fiber and a nonwoven substrate, the fiber comprising at leasttwo elastic polymers, one polymer preferably a thermoplastic elastomer,more preferably a TPU, and the other polymer a homogeneously branchedpolyolefin, preferably a homogeneously branched, substantially linearethylene polymer, in which the fiber is melt bonded to the nonwovensubstrate in the absence of an adhesive. Exemplary fabricated structuresof this embodiment include the leg cuffs, leg gatherers, waistbands andside panels of a disposable diaper.

In another embodiment of the invention, the ratio of nonelastic staplefibers, e.g., cellulose fibers, bonded to elastic fibers versusnonelastic staple fibers bonded to other nonelastic staple fibers, isincreased by a method in which the elastic fiber is a hydrophobic fibergrafted with a hydrophilic agent, e.g., a polyethylene fiber graftedwith maleic anhydride. In an extension of this embodiment, and in whichthe hydrophilic agent is an acid or an anhydride, e.g., maleicanhydride, once the agent is grafted to the fiber it is then reactedwith an amine.

In another embodiment of the invention, for those nonelastic staplefibers that bind to one another due to hydrogen bonding, e.g., cellulosefibers, the ratio of nonelastic staple fibers bonded to elastic fibersversus nonelastic staple fibers bonded to other nonelastic staple fibersis increased by treating the nonelastic staple fibers, prior to orsimultaneously with blending these fibers with the elastic fibers, witha debonding agent, e.g., a quaternary ammonium compound containing oneor more acid groups. The debonding agent deactivates at least a part ofthe hydrogen bonding between the nonelastic staple fibers.

In another embodiment of the invention, blending of nonelastic staplefibers with elastic fibers is enhanced by blending the fibers in anaqueous media, preferably in the presence of a surfactant and withintense agitation. This procedure enhances the separation of the elasticfibers from one another, and thus makes each fiber more accessible forbonding with a nonelastic staple fiber. This method can be used alone orin combination with one or more other fiber separation embodiments ofthis invention.

In another embodiment of the invention, high intensity air mixing isused to separate elastic fibers from one another prior to blending withstaple fibers. This technique also promotes separation of the elasticfibers from one another, and this, in turn, improves their accessibilityfor bonding with the staple fibers. This embodiment of the invention canalso be used alone or in combination with one or more other embodimentsof the invention.

The three fiber separation and the grafting embodiments described aboveare particularly useful in the construction of elastic absorbentstructures such as diapers, wound dressings and the like.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Elastic Bicomponent and Biconstituent Fibers

As here used, “fiber” or “fibrous” means a particulate material in whichthe length to diameter ratio of such material is greater than about 10.Conversely, “nonfiber” or “nonfibrous” means a particulate material inwhich the length to diameter ratio is about 10 or less.

As here used, “elastic” or “elastomeric” describes a fiber or otherstructure, e.g., a film, that will recover at least about 50 percent ofits stretched length after both the first pull and after the fourth pullto 100 percent strain (doubled the length). Elasticity can also bedescribed by the “permanent set” of the fiber. Permanent set is measuredby stretching a fiber to a certain point and subsequently releasing itto its original position, and then stretching it again. The point atwhich the fiber begins to pull a load is designated as the percentpermanent set.

As here used, “bicomponent fiber” means a fiber comprising at least twocomponents, i.e., of having at least two distinct polymeric regimes. Thefirst component, i.e., “component A”, serves the purpose of generallyretaining the fiber form during the thermal bonding temperatures. Thesecond component, i.e., “component B”, serves the function of anadhesive. Typically, component A has a higher melting point thancomponent B, preferably component A will melt at a temperature at leastabout 20 C, preferably at least 40 C, higher than at the temperature atwhich component B will melt.

For simplicity, the structure of the bicomponent fibers is typicallyreferred to as a core/sheath structure. However, the structure of thefiber can have any one of a number of multi-component configurations,e.g., symmetrical core-sheath, asymmetrical core-sheath, side-by-side,pie sections, crescent moon and the like for bicomponent fibers. Theessential feature on each of these configurations is that at least part,preferably at least a major part, of the external surface of the fibercomprises the sheath portion of the fiber, i.e., the adhesive, or lowermelting point, or less than 30 wt % gel, or component B, of the fiber.FIGS. 1A-1F of U.S. Pat. No. 6,225,243, the disclosure of which isincorporated herein by reference, illustrate various core/sheathconstructions.

As here used, “biconstituent fiber” means a fiber comprising an intimateblend of at least two polymer constituents. The structure of thebiconstituent fiber is an islands-in-the-sea construction.

The bicomponent fibers used in the practice of this invention areelastic and, each component of the bicomponent fiber is elastic. Elasticbicomponent and biconstituent fibers are known, e.g., U.S. Pat. No.6,140,442 the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.

In this invention, the core (component A) is a thermoplastic elastomericpolymer illustrative of which are diblock, triblock or multiblockelastomeric copolymers such as olefinic copolymers such asstyrene-isoprene-styrene, styrene-butadiene-styrene,styrene-ethylene/butylene-styrene or styrene-ethylene/propylene-styrene,such as those available from the Shell Chemical Company under the tradedesignation Kraton elastomeric resin; polyurethanes, such as thoseavailable from The Dow Chemical Company under the trade designationPELLATHANE polyurethanes or spandex available from E. I. Du Pont deNemours Co. under the trade designation Lycra; polyamides, such aspolyether block amides available from Elf AtoChem Company under thetrade designation Pebax polyether block amide; and polyesters, such asthose available from E. I. Du Pont de Nemours Co. under the tradedesignation Hytrel polyester. Thermoplastic urethanes (i.e.,polyurethanes) are a preferred core polymer, particularly Pellethanepolyurethanes.

The sheath (the adhesive or component B) is also elastomeric, and it isa homogeneously branched polyolefin, preferably a homogeneously branchedethylene polymer and more preferably a homogeneously branched,substantially linear ethylene polymer. These materials are well known.For example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,140,442 provides an excellent descriptionof the preferred homogeneously branched, substantially linear ethylenepolymers, and it includes many references to other patents and nonpatentliterature that describe other homogeneously branched polyolefins.

The homogenously branched polyolefin has a density (as measured byASTM/D792) of about 0.91 g/cm³ or less with a melting point at or below110 C (as measured by DSC). More preferably, the density of thepolyolefin is between about 0.85 and about 0.89 g/cm³ with a meltingpoint between about 50 and about 70 C. Preferably, the polyolefin has aviscosity at the melt point that permits easy flow for bonding to thestaple fibers or a nonwoven fabric structure. The melt index (MI asmeasured by ASTM D1238 at 190 C) for the polyolefin is at least about30, and preferably at least about 100. Additives such as antioxidants(e.g., hindered phenolics (e.g., Irganox.RTM. 1010 made by Ciba-GeigyCorp.), and phosphites (e.g., Irgafos.RTM. 169 made by Ciba-GeigyCorp.)), cling additives (e.g., polyisobutylene (PIB)), antiblockadditives, pigments and the like can also be included in thehomogeneously branched ethylene polymers used to make the elastic fibersto the extent that they do not interfere with the enhanced fiber andfabric properties characteristic of this invention.

The gel content of the polyolefin is less than 30, preferably less than20 and more preferably less than 10, weight percent. The gel content isa measure of the degree of cross-linking of the polyolefin and because aprincipal function of the polyolefin is to provide a meltable exteriorcomponent to the fiber for easy thermal bonding to staple fibers and/ornonwoven structures, little, if any, cross-linking of the polyolefin ispreferred. In addition, usually the less cross-linked a polyolefin, thelower its melting point. “Nonwoven structure” means a group of fibersconnected together in such a fashion such that the group forms acohesive, integrated structure. Such structures can be formed bytechniques known in the art, such as air-laid, spun bonding, staplefiber carding, thermal bonding, and melt blown and spun lacing. Polymersuseful for making such fibers include PET, PBT, nylon, polyolefins,silicas, polyurethanes, poly(p-phenylene terephthalamide), Lycra® (apolyurethane made from the reaction of polyethylene glycol andtoluene-2,4-diisocyanate by E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co.), carbonfibers and natural polymers such as cellulose and polyamide.

As here used, “staple fiber” means a natural fiber or a length cut from,for example, a manufactured filament. These fibers act in the absorbentstructure of this invention as a temporary reservoir for liquid and alsoas a conduit for liquid distribution. Staple fibers include natural andsynthetic materials. Natural materials include cellulosic fibers andtextile fibers such as cotton and rayon. Synthetic materials includenonabsorbent synthetic polymeric fibers, e.g. polyolefins, polyesters,polyacrylics, polyamides and polystyrenes. Nonabsorbent synthetic staplefibers are preferably crimped, i.e., fibers having a continuous wavy,curvy or jagged character along their length. Cellulosic fibers are thepreferred staple fibers for reasons of availability, cost andabsorbency.

In order to promote good mixing of the staple and elastic fibers, thebicomponent fibers are preferably “wetted”. As here used, “wetted” or“wettable” means a fiber which exhibits a liquid in air contact angle ofless than 90 degrees. These terms and the measurement of this propertyare more fully described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,645,542.

The wettable staple and elastic fibers are present in the elastomericabsorbent structure of this invention in an amount sufficient to impartthe desired absorbent and elastic properties. Typically, the staplefiber is present in an amount from about 20 to about 80 percent byweight, preferably from about 25 to about 75 and more preferably fromabout 30 to about 70 percent, by weight based on the total weight of thestaple fiber and elastic fiber.

Although the bicomponent and/or biconstituent fibers are used in thesame manner as other elastomeric fibers for the construction of elastic,absorbent structures, preferably these fibers are used in combinationwith one or more of the embodiments of this invention as describedbelow. In any instance, however, the use of a bicomponent orbiconstituent fiber as the elastic fiber component of elastic, absorbentstructures provides an elastic, absorbent structure with improvedelasticity without compromising the absorbency of the structure. Thisresults in lighter, thinner and/or better form-fitting structures.

Graft-Modified Elastic Fibers

In this embodiment of the invention, adhesion of the elastomeric fibersto the staple fibers is enhanced by grafting to the elastomeric fiber acompound containing a polar group, such as a carbonyl, hydroxyl or acidgroup. This embodiment of the invention is applicable to both homofiland bicomponent or biconstituent elastomeric fibers. “Homofil” fibersare fibers comprising a single component or, in other words, areessentially homogeneous throughout their length. With respect tobicomponent and biconstituent fibers, the polar group containingcompound is grafted to the sheath component (i.e., the component thatforms at least a part of the exterior surface) of the fiber.

The organic compound containing the polar group can be grafted to theelastomeric fiber by any known technique, e.g., those taught in U.S.Pat. Nos. 3,236,917 and 5,194,509 of which the disclosures of both areincorporated herein by reference. For example, in the '917 patent thepolymer (i.e., the elastomeric fiber polymer) is introduced into atwo-roll mixer and mixed at a temperature of 60 C. An unsaturated,carbonyl-containing organic compound is then added along with a freeradical initiator, such as, for example, benzoyl peroxide, and thecomponents are mixed at 30 C until the grafting is completed. In the'509 patent, the procedure is similar except that the reactiontemperature is higher, e.g. 210-300 C, and a free radical initiator isnot used.

An alternative and preferred method of grafting is taught in U.S. Pat.No. 4,950,541 the disclosure of which is also incorporated herein byreference. This procedure uses a twin-screw devolatilizing extruder asthe mixing apparatus. The elastomeric fiber, e.g., a polyolefin, and anunsaturated carbonyl-containing compound are mixed and reacted withinthe extruder at temperatures at which the reactants are molten and inthe presence of a free radical initiator. In this procedure, preferablythe unsaturated carbonyl-containing organic compound is injected into azone maintained under pressure within the extruder.

The polymer from which the fiber is made is usually grafted with thepolar group containing compound prior to the formation of the fiber (bywhatever method is used to construct the fiber).

The polar group containing organic compounds which are grafted to theelastomeric fiber are unsaturated, i.e., they contain at least onedouble bond. Representative and preferred unsaturated organic compoundsthat contain at least one polar group are the ethylenically unsaturatedcarboxylic acids, anhydrides, esters and their salts, both metallic andnon-metallic. Preferably, the organic compound contains ethylenicunsaturation conjugated with a carbonyl group. Representative compoundsinclude maleic, fumaric, acrylic, methacrylic, itaconic, crotonic,alpha-methylcrotonic, cinnamic and the like, acids and their anhydride,ester and salt derivatives, if any. Maleic anhydride is the preferredunsaturated organic compound containing at least one ethylenicunsaturation and at least one carbonyl group.

The unsaturated organic compound component of the grafted elastomericfiber is present in an amount of at least about 0.01 percent, preferablyat least about 0.1 and more preferably at least about 0.5 percent, byweight based on the combined weight of the elastomeric fiber and theorganic compound. The maximum amount of unsaturated organic compound canvary to convenience, but typically it does not exceed about 10,preferably it does not exceed about 5, and more preferably it does notexceed about 2, weight percent.

With respect to bicomponent and biconstituent fibers, the graft can beproduced by either graft-reacting the polar group containing compoundwith all of the sheath component (component B1), or by using a graftconcentrate or master batch (B2), i.e., the polar group containingcompound mixed with the sheath component. If such a blend of componentsis used, then preferably component B2 is between about 5 and 50, andmore preferably between about 5 and 15, weight percent of thecombination of B1 and B2. The preferred concentration of the polar groupcontaining compound in the blend is such that after blending with thesheath component, the final mixture has a final polar group containingconcentration of at least 0.01 percent by weight, and preferably atleast about 0.1 percent by weight.

In those situations in which a graft concentrate is used with respect toa bicomponent fiber, preferably the graft concentrate (B2), is of alower viscosity than the matrix adhesive material (B1). This willenhance migration of the graft component to the surface of the fiberduring passage of the material through a fiber-forming die. The object,of course, is to enhance the adhesion of the bond fiber to the staplefiber by enhancing the concentration of the graft compound to the fibersurface. Preferably, the melt index of component B2 is between 2 and 10times the melt index of component B1.

Deactivation of Cellulose Hydrogen Bonds

In another embodiment of the invention (an embodiment in which thestaple fibers are cellulose fibers), the elastic performance of theabsorbent elastic structure is enhanced through the promotion of morecellulosic-elastic fiber bonds at the expense of cellulosic-cellulosicfiber bonds. In this embodiment, the cellulosic staple fibers aretreated either prior to or simultaneously with their mixing with theelstomeric fibers with a debonding agent. These bonds and theirdisruption were described in a presentation given by Craig Poffenbergerentitled “Bulk and Performance, But Soft and Safe” at the Insight 2000Non-wovens/Absorbents Conference held in Toronto from Oct. 30 throughNov. 2, 2000. With the decoupling of these hydrogen bonds, morecellulose fiber is available to bond with the elastic fiber and the morecellulose-elastic fiber bonds that are formed, the more elastic is theresulting absorbent structure.

Compounds that are useful in decoupling inter-fiber hydrogen bonds ofcellulose fibers include quaternary ammonium compounds containing one ormore acid or anhydride groups. Typical of these compounds aredifattydimethyl, imidazolinum, N-alkyldimethylbenzyl and dialkoxylatedalkyldimethyl. The debonding agent is used in an amount of about 0.01 toabout 10 percent by weight based on the weight of cellulose fiber to betreated. Another compound that is useful in decouplingcellulose-cellulose hydrogen bonding is AROSURF PA-777, a surfactantmanufactured by Goldschmidt Corp.

This embodiment of the invention can be used alone or in combinationwith one or more of the other embodiments of the invention.

Agitation in a Water Media to Separate Elastic Fibers

In this embodiment of the invention, the elastic fibers are separatedfrom one another by agitation in a water media. Elastic fibers,typically fine denier elastic fibers, are difficult to separate from oneanother and as such, are difficult to blend uniformly with staple fibersduring the construction of an elastic absorbent structure. As here used,“fine denier” elastic fiber means an elastic fiber having a diameter ofless than about 15 denier per filament. Fibers are typically classifiedaccording to their diameter, and monofilament fiber is generally definedas having an individual fiber diameter greater than about 15 denier,usually greater than about 30 denier. Microdenier fibers are generallydefined as fiber having a diameter of less than about 100 microns.

In this embodiment, the elastic fibers are placed in an aqueous media,and then are subjected to vigorous agitation by any conventional means,e.g. mechanical stirrer, jet pump, etc. Surfactants and/or wettingagents can be employed and after the elastic fibers have sufficientlyseparated from one another, the staple fibers can be added. In apreferred embodiment of this invention, the staple fibers are added incombination with a debonding agent. After a homogeneous blend of theelastic and staple fibers has been formed, the water is removed,typically by filtering followed by exposure to heat, e.g. time in anoven. Once sufficiently dry, the resulting fluff pulp is ready forprocessing into an elastic absorbent structure. At this point, variousadditives, e.g. super absorbent powder, can be added to the pulp. Duringthe drawing step, care is required to avoid warming the fibers to atemperature that would prematurely activate/melt the bond fibers.

This particular embodiment is also useful with any elastomeric fiber ofany composition and structure (including homofil fibers), and it is alsouseful with any staple fiber.

High Intensity Air Mixing

In this embodiment of the invention, the elastomeric fibers areseparated from one another using a high intensity air mixing technique.This technique is similar to the agitation in a water media techniquedescribed above, except it does not employ an aqueous media (or for thatmatter, any liquid media). The elastomeric fiber, either homofil orbicomponent, is subjected to intense agitation, either mechanically orthrough pneumatic means, and once sufficiently separated, and in afurther embodiment of this invention, blended with the staple fibers.While this technique avoids the need for drying the resulting blend offibers, it does not lend itself well to use in combination with adebonding agent for the cellulosic fibers, or surfactants and/or wettingagents for use with the elastomeric fibers. Here too, however, thisembodiment can be combined with one or more other embodiments of theinvention, e.g., use of bicomponent or biconstituent elastomeric fibers,graft-modified elastomeric fibers, and cellulosic fibers of which thehydrogen bonding between fibers has previously been deactivated.

Elastic Absorbent Structure Construction

The elastic absorbent structure of this invention can be constructedfrom a blend of staple fibers and bicomponent and/or biconstituentelastic fibers of a core/sheath construction in which the core is athermoplastic urethane and the sheath is a homogeneously branchedpolyolefin. According to this embodiment, the blend of staple andelastic fibers is prepared in any conventional manner and/or using anyone of the inventive techniques described above and, optionally, issubsequently admixed with one or more super-absorbent polymers. Thisadmixture is also performed using conventional technology but due to thepresence of the low melt temperature adhesive component in thebicomponent or biconstituent fiber (i.e., the homogeneously branchedpolyolefin), the fluff pulp can be bonded together with heat as low asabout 70 C to form an elastic absorbent structure, e.g. a diaper. Thelower melt point of the adhesive component of the elastic bond fibersallows the use of currently-in-use commercial equipment but at a lowertemperature which, in turn, means the faster production rates areachieved over both monofil elastomeric fibers and bicomponentelastomeric fibers in which the adhesive component has a higher melttemperature. However, the lower melt temperature and/or faster bond ratereduces or alleviates the problems of bond fiber activation in, orin-line with, the structure making machines, e.g., a diaper-makingmachine.

In conventional absorbent cores or structures, the cellulosic fibers aretypically bonded to one another using latex. The latex often collects atthe cellulosic fiber interfaces and, upon curing, holds the cellulosicfibers together. The use of a bicomponent or biconstituent bond fiberwith two distinct regimes, e.g., a core and sheath, make for a betterbond system. The core has a melting point above the oven temperature,and the sheath has melt point below the oven temperature. Thebicomponent and biconstituent fibers efficiently fuse to the cellulosicfibers wherever they touch. The connections between the cellulosicfibers are thus longer than just the size of the fusion joints. This, inturn, produces a more flexible structure.

Homogeneously branched ethylene polymers, particularly homogeneouslybranched, substantially linear ethylene polymers, make excellent sheathmaterials because their melting point is lower than many other elasticpolymeric materials. Preferably, the sheath material will melt at leastabout 20 C, more preferably at least about 40 C, below the melt point ofthe core material.

Elastic Paper Construction

Bicomponent and biconstituent elastic bond fibers are useful in theproduction of elastic paper, i.e., paper with some degree of elasticity.As described above, these elastic bond fibers for elastic paper comprisean elastic polyurethane core with an elastic homogeneously branchedpolyofelin, more preferably a homogeneously branched polyolefin graftedwith maleic anhydride or similar compound. If these bicomponent elasticfibers are mixed with cellulose fibers without interrupting thecellulose-cellulose hydrogen bonds, then the addition of thesebicomponent or biconstituent elastic fibers will reduce tensil andprovide some measure of elasticity, but the paper will tear at fivepercent strain. In other words, the benefit of the addition ofbicomponent and/or biconstituent elastic fiber is minimized if thecellulose-cellulose hydrogen bonds are not interrupted.

If, however, the cellulose-cellulose hydrogen bonds are interrupted withbicomponent or biconstituent elastic fiber, then the resulting paperexhibits a marked drop in tensil, significant elastic recovery, andresists tear at five percent strain. The cellulose-cellulose hydrogenbonds can be interrupted as taught above.

To maximize the benefit of the disrupted cellulose-cellulose hydrogenbonds, good dispersion of the bicomponent elastic fiber with thecellulosic fiber is desired. Dispersion of the bicomponent elastic fiberwithin the cellulose fiber matrix is enhanced by separating the elasticfiber bundles prior to mixing with the cellulose fibers. Here too, theseparation of fiber bundles is facilitated by either the dry (i.e., highintensity air agitation) or wet separation methods taught above, withthe dry separation method preferred over the wet separation method.

The elasticity of the paper is also influenced by the structure of thefibers. Low modulus elastic fibers provide good fabric performance, butare awkward to process. Long bond fibers (i.e., bicomponent andbiconstituent elastic fibers) mixed with short matrix fibers (i.e.,cellulose fibers) produce a paper with better elasticity (i.e., lessintersectional bonding) but the complete dispersion is more difficultbecause the long flexible elastic fibers twist easily which make themdifficult to unbundle. However, if the elastic bond fibers are thick,they make for a better dispersion although they have an adverse impacton the economics. In sum, a preferred balance of elasticity anddispersion results from the use of a mix of low modulus fibers, the bondfibers of which are long and thick and the matrix fibers are short.

In addition, the amount of elastic fibers in the paper also has animpact on the paper strength and elasticity. Too few bicomponent orbiconstituent elastic bond fibers results in poor bonding of the otherfibers into the fabric which results in a paper with poor strength andelasticity. Too many such elastic bond fibers results in too manyintersectional bonds and while the paper strength is good, itselasticity is poor. The negative effect of too many bicomponent elasticbond fibers can be reduced, however, by using a higher loft in the paperconstruction.

The following examples are illustrative of certain of the embodiments ofthis invention described above. All parts and percentages are by weightunless otherwise noted.

SPECIFIC EMBODIMENTS EXAMPLE 1 Graft Modification of Polyethylene

A substantially linear ethylene/1-octene polymer (MI-73, density-0.87g/cm³) is grafted with maleic anhydride to produce a material with a MIof 34.6 and a 0.35 weight percent content of units derived from maleicanhydride. The grafting procedure taught in U.S. Pat. No. 4,950,541 isfollowed. The grafted polyethylene is used as a graft concentrate, andis let down 2:1 with an ethylene/1-octene polyolefin with an MI of 30and a density of 0.87 g/cm³. The resulting let-down material is used toform the sheath (adhesive component) of the bicomponent elastic fiberused in the following examples.

EXAMPLE 2A Fiber Separation Using Intensive Mixing in an Aqueous Medium

Bicomponent, 11.2 denier elastic fiber comprising 50 percentPellathane^(tm) 2103-80 PF (an elastomeric thermoplastic polyurethanemanufactured by The Dow Chemical Company) and 50 percent homogeneouslybranched, substantially linear ethyline/1-octene polyolefin is preparedas described in Example 1 above. The thermoplastic polyurethane formsthe core and the MAH-grafted ethylene polymer forms the sheath of thebicomponent fiber. A mixture of 30 percent of this elastomeric bondfiber and 70 percent Hi Bright cellulose fibers (unbeaten, bleachedkraft softwood, macerated and soaked overnight at 1.1 percent in water)in 5 liters of water with 5 grams surfactant (Rhodameer, Katapol VP-532)and 110 grams of 0.5 percent solid Magnafloc 1885 anionic polyacrylamideviscosity modifier is added to a Waring blender. The mixture is stirredto produce a substantially uniform mixture of elastic and cellulosefibers which are subsequently formed into an elastic, absorbent paper.

EXAMPLE 2B Fiber Separation Using Intensive Mixing in an Aqueous Mediumand Hydrogen Bonding Deactivation

Sample Designation Core/Sheath Composition* Denier 1.2 TPU/Engage (30MI) 6.78 1.3 TPU/MAH-g-Engage (30 MI) 11.32 2.2 TPU/Engage (30 MI) — 3.2TPU/Engage (18 MI) 6.4 3.3 TPU/Engage (18 MI) 11.4

Initially, all of the five fiber systems (tows) listed above are cut to⅛″ length using a scissors. A 100 g/m² air-laid pad with 12% binderfiber loading needs to incorporate 0.43 g of binder fiber by weight.Sufficient amount of fiber is cut in all cases to produce 3 pads.

Following the cutting of the fiber tows (each tow has 72 individualfiber filaments) to length, the next step is to separate individualfibers from the tows so that these can be incorporated into cellulosepulp and air laid into a pad. The sheath polymer(s) in all the cases arequite “tacky” even at room temperature (0.870 g/cc density) and theindividual fibers are completely “fused” together in all cases overtime.

To separate the fiber tows into individual filaments, 0.43 g of binderfiber is weighed and added to a Waring™ blender. To this is added 2.00 gof cellulose pulp (a total of 3.195 g of cellulose pulp is used in a 100gsm pad). Next, a 25:1 solution of water with AROSURF™ PA-777 surfactantblend from Goldschmidt Corp. is added to the binder fiber plus cellulosepulp mix. The blender is activated for 2-3 seconds and during this timethe binder fiber tows instantaneously “open” up into individual fiberfilaments. The cellulose pulp is added to the above mix to ensure thatthe binder fiber filaments stay separated during the subsequent dryingprocess. The above procedure not only enables the separation of binderfiber into individual filaments, but it also results in deactivating thehydrogen bonding in pulp.

The next step entails drying the binder fiber and pulp mixture. Thefibers are first separated from the water/surfactant solution using asieve. This fiber mixture is then dried overnight in a vacuum oven at50° C. to ensure that any residual moisture is also removed. The driedfiber mixture is then incorporated into the air-laid chamber (anadditional 1.195 gms of “deactivated” and dried cellulose pulp is alsoadded at this time) and an absorbent pad structure is made using avacuum assist process.

EXAMPLE 3 Elastic Paper Comparison

Eight inch by eight inch (8″×8″) elastic paper samples are prepared byusing the procedure of Example 2. Samples 3.1 and 3.2 both comprise 100percent Hi Bright cellulose fiber. Examples 3.3 through 3.8 are madefrom varying percentages of Hi Bright cellulose fiber and the elasticbicomponent fiber described in Example 2 above. Samples 3.9 and 3.10contain a third fiber component, i.e. nylon fiber. The paper samples aremade using a Noble & Wood paper-making machine.

Sample 3.4 is prepared by presoaking 0.9 grams of the bicomponent fiberin 50 cc of water plus 5 drops of Katapol surfactant (VP-532), and thenit is soaked for another five minutes before the addition of 190 cc ofHi Bright fibers. The rationale for this procedure is to use thethickening effect of the cellulose fibers to break up the clumps of thebicomponent fiber. The Waring blender is run at 1500 rpm. The resultingpaper, which is dried on an Emerson apparatus at 250 F, still hasvisible clumps of bicomponent fibers. However, when the paper is torn,the tear is between bonded elastic fibers.

The paper of Sample 3.5 is prepared in essentially the same manner asthat of Sample 3.4 except that some of the clumps of the bicomponentfiber are broken up in a dry state within the Waring blender (an exampleof high intensity air agitation). After these clumps are broken up, 50cc of water with five drops of Katapol are added to the blender and themixture is stirred again at a low setting. Subsequently, 190 cc of HiBright cellulose fiber with another 100 cc of water are added to themixture, and stirred for an additional 5 minutes at 1000 rpm. The paperof this sample has less visible clumps, and the tear occurs betweenbonded elastic fibers.

Sample 3.6 paper is about 70 pound grade made with the same cellulosepulp content of the previous samples, i.e., 190 cc. Two grams ofbicomponent fiber are added to and then broken up in a Waring blender ona dry basis (i.e., in the absence of an aqueous media) at a low settingfor one and a half minutes (this procedure is repeated three times witha scrape-down of the blender walls between each stirring). One hundredmilliliters of water are subsequently added with five drops of Katapol,the resulting mixture is once again stirred at a low setting for oneminute, and then it is combined with 190 cc of Hi Bright cellulosefibers plus enough water to make 600 cc of total mixture. This totalmixture is then transferred to a beaker and stirred at 1500 rpm for twominutes. Paper made from this mixture demonstrates some elasticitybefore tear.

Sample 3.7 is a repeat of sample 3.6 except 2.4 grams of bicomponentfiber is used instead of 2.0 grams.

Sample 3.8 is a repeat of sample 3.7 except an anti-foam is added withthe Katapol (Foammaster VF made by Diamond Shamrock, 3 drops).

Sample 3.9 is a repeat of sample 3.8 except 5 grams of 0.080 SD nylonfibers from Microfibers of Pawtucket, RI are also added. The nylon isadded with 100 cc of water, and it produces a high dispersion withalmost no stirring. The nylon-water mixture is added to the bicomponentfiber-Hi Bright mixture and the total mixture of 600 cc is stirred at1500 rpm for two minutes. The purpose of the nylon addition is tofacilitate the break-up of the bonding between the cellulose fibers.

Sample 3.10 is a repeat of Sample 3.9 except 2.4 grams of bicomponentfiber, 20 drops of Katapol, 6 drops of antifoam, 2 grams of nylon fibersand 100 cc of Hi Bright cellulose fibers (about 1.1 grams) are used.

The particulars of the samples and the results of their testing on anInstron instrument are reported in the following Table. SUMMARY OFELASTIC PAPER DATA @ 5% strain (0.10 inch displ.), Instron (1″ wide, 2″jaw space) Lb (Avg of 2 Tests) Initial Grams (and %) per 8″ × 8″ PaperSample 2nd Pull, 2nd Pull @ ‘steep’ 2nd Pull Sample Bico Nylon DropsTore, Peak @ 5% 5% strain, displ., initial Number Pulp Fiber Fiber TotalKatapol Yes/No Tensile strain % of Peak inch displ, inch 3.1   3 (100%)0 0 3 0 Y, Y 9.00 0.00 0 0.018 Total rip 3.2 2.1 (100%) 0 0 2.1 0 Y, Y5.55 0.00 0 0.018 Total rip 3.3 2.1 (70%) 0.9 (30%) 0 3 0 Y, Y 4.50 0.153 0.018 — 0.059 3.4 2.1 (70%) 0.9 (30%) 0 3 5 Y, Y 2.30 0.20 9 0.0230.062 3.5 2.1 (70%) 0.9 (30%) 0 3 5 Y, Y 2.65 0.58 22 0.022 0.045 3.62.1 (51%)   2 (49%) 0 4.1 5 — 2.35 0.55 23 0.014 0.044 3.7 2.1 (47%) 2.4(53%) 0 4.5 5 — 2.80 1.10 39 0.019 0.045 3.8 2.1 (47%) 2.4 (53%) 0 4.5 5+ — 3.45 2.15 62 0.023 0.038 antifoam 3.9 2.1 (42%) 2.4 (48%) 0.5 520+ — 3.05 0.65 21 0.018 — (10%) antifoam 3.10 1.1 (20%) 2.4 (44%) 2 5.520+ Y, N 0.85 0.50 59 0.023 0.038 (36%) antifoam

Although the invention has been described in detail by the precedingexamples, the detail is for the purpose of illustration and is not to beconstrued as a limitation upon the invention. Many variations can bemade upon the preceding examples without departing from the spirit andscope of the following claims.

1. A method of separating cellulosic fibers from one another, the methodcomprising treating the cellulosic fibers with a quartemary ammoniumcompound and then subjecting the treated fibers to agitation.
 2. Amethod of separating elastic fibers from one another, the methodcomprising subjecting the elastic fibers to agitation in an aqueousmedia comprising a surfactant.
 3. A method of separating elastic fibersfrom one another, the method comprising subjecting the elastic fibers tohigh intensity air mixing.